FX:EURUSD   ยูโร / ดอลลาร์สหรัฐฯ
จำนวนเข้าชม 2122
8
2122 5
Script Revision: 2

*** USE AT YOUR OWN RISK ***
There are drawing/painting issues in pinescript when working across resolutions/timeframes that I simply cannot fix here.. I will not be putting any further effort into developing this until such a time when workarounds become available.

V2 Changes:
  • Simplified and cleaned up plotting, now just shows a Moving Average derived from the average of open/close.
  • Tried very hard to alleviate painting issues caused by referencing alternate resolution..
Description:
  • Strategy based around Open-Close Crossovers.
Setup:
  • I have generally found that setting the strategy resolution to 3-4x that of the chart you are viewing tends to yield the best results, regardless of which MA option you may choose (if any) - can cause a lot of false positives, be aware of this.
  • Don't aim for perfection. Just aim to get a reasonably snug fit with the O-C band, with good runs of green and red.
  • Option to either use basic open and close series data, or pick your poison with a wide array of MA types.
  • Optional trailing stop for damage mitigation if desired (can be toggled on/off)
  • Positions get taken automagically following a crossover - which is why it's better to set the resolution of the script greater than that of your chart, so that the trades get taken sooner rather than later.
  • If you make use of the stops/trailing stops, be sure to take your time tweaking the values. Cutting it too fine will cost you profits but keep you safer, while letting them loose could lead to more drawdown than you can handle.

ไอเดียที่เกี่ยวข้อง

JayRogers
Open Close Cross Strategy, WIP
JayRogers เกี่ยวกับ EURUSD 16
Can i request for access @JayRogers
ตอบกลับ
Hello Jay

How do I get version 2
+1 ตอบกลับ
Great strategy - was impressed with the nice smooth equity curve. Thanks for sharing. As it is not possible to auto-trade in tradingview to-date I modelled the same strategy (DEMA) Open/Close Cross in another package that allows me to use bid/ask broker data. The results were markedly different with a trade win rate no higher than 40%, despite the trade entries being almost identical. At first I thought this is because of the spread - which does have some impact. However, upon low-level examination of the entry/exit prices in the two models it appears that your model evaluation is done on bar close, however you take the open (or near open) price as your entry from the same bar. In live trading this is obviously not possible. Have I understood this correctly? Or is this a limitation of the back testing framework? All comments made in a positive light - I'm just trying to understand the differences. Thanks a lot - again, great work.
ตอบกลับ
amscales amscales
@amscales, FYI - just read the other thread relating to v1 of this strategy which I guess comes to the same conclusion. Anyway, cheers.
ตอบกลับ
Any plans on unlocking it for beta testing?
ตอบกลับ
หน้าแรก ตัวช่วยคัดกรองหุ้น ตัวคัดกรองฟอเร็กซ์ ตัวคัดกรองคริปโต ปฏิทินเศรษฐกิจ มันทำงานได้อย่างไร ข้อมูลสำคัญของชาร์ต ราคา กฎของบ้าน ผู้ดูแลการใช้งาน เว็บไซต์ & โบรกเกอร์ โซลูชั่น วิดเจ็ต โซลูชั่นชาร์ต ศูนย์ช่วยเหลือ คำร้องขอเพิ่มเติมลักษณะและบริการ บล็อก & ข่าว คำถามที่พบบ่อย วิกิ Twitter
ข้อมูลส่วนตัว ตั้งค่าประวัติ บัญชีและการเรียกเก็บเงิน เหรียญ TradingView ตั๋วการขอความสนับสนุนของฉัน ศูนย์ช่วยเหลือ ไอเดียที่ถูกตีพิมพ์ ผู้ติดตาม กำลังติดตาม ข้อความส่วนตัว แชท ออกจากระบบ