BTCUSDT Perpetual ContractāļĨāļāļĨāļ
BTC.USDT BTC depthðĪ part2
Hi guys
I have published several bitcoin analytics for you, 90% of which are still valid, and you can see them from my trading view account.
But in general, in my opinion, we are in the bear market, just when the risk of a weekly trend was broken.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSDT/O1FXZ6LQ-btc-dead/
In my opinion, this was the best bitcoin analysis. But no one believed it. All the people were making fun of me.
But, now read the new analysis and tell me your opinion about it.
Scenario 1: If the price returns from this level, we should record strong return candles. Also, when it comes to this level, the purchase volume should increase. This is the third time this line has been hit.
Scenario 2: I like this scenario very much.
For the third time, level 36 is being tested. As I said before, it can be easily broken.
In my opinion, the depth of bitcoin, temporarily, I emphasize, temporarily, is 30-29600.
I have published several bitcoin analytics for you, 90% of which are still valid, and you can see them from my trading view account.
But in general, in my opinion, we are in the bear market, just when the risk of a weekly trend was broken.
https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSDT/O1FXZ6LQ-btc-dead/
In my opinion, this was the best bitcoin analysis. But no one believed it. All the people were making fun of me.
But, now read the new analysis and tell me your opinion about it.
Scenario 1: If the price returns from this level, we should record strong return candles. Also, when it comes to this level, the purchase volume should increase. This is the third time this line has been hit.
Scenario 2: I like this scenario very much.
For the third time, level 36 is being tested. As I said before, it can be easily broken.
In my opinion, the depth of bitcoin, temporarily, I emphasize, temporarily, is 30-29600.
āļāļēāļĢāļāļģāđāļŠāļāļāļāļĩāđāđāļāļĩāđāļĒāļ§āļāđāļāļ
āļāļģāļāļģāļāļąāļāļŠāļīāļāļāļīāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļāļāļīāļāļāļāļ
āļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđāđāļāđāļĄāļĩāļ§āļąāļāļāļļāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļāļāđāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļāđāļŦāđāđāļāļīāļāļāļīāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļīāļ, āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļāļāļļāļ, āļāļēāļĢāļāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļĒ, āļāđāļāđāļŠāļāļāđāļāļ° āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļāļģāđāļāļ°āļāļģāļāļĢāļ°āđāļ āļāļāļ·āđāļ āđ āļāļĩāđāđāļŦāđāļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļĢāļąāļāļĢāļāļāđāļāļĒ TradingView āļāđāļēāļāđāļāļīāđāļĄāđāļāļīāļĄāļāļĩāđ āļāđāļāļāļģāļŦāļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļāļēāļ
āļāļēāļĢāļāļģāđāļŠāļāļāļāļĩāđāđāļāļĩāđāļĒāļ§āļāđāļāļ
āļāļģāļāļģāļāļąāļāļŠāļīāļāļāļīāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļāļāļīāļāļāļāļ
āļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļĄāđāđāļāđāļĄāļĩāļ§āļąāļāļāļļāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļāļāđāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļāđāļŦāđāđāļāļīāļāļāļīāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļīāļ, āļāļēāļĢāļĨāļāļāļļāļ, āļāļēāļĢāļāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļĒ, āļāđāļāđāļŠāļāļāđāļāļ° āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļāļģāđāļāļ°āļāļģāļāļĢāļ°āđāļ āļāļāļ·āđāļ āđ āļāļĩāđāđāļŦāđāļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļĢāļąāļāļĢāļāļāđāļāļĒ TradingView āļāđāļēāļāđāļāļīāđāļĄāđāļāļīāļĄāļāļĩāđ āļāđāļāļāļģāļŦāļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļāļēāļ