TradingView
faylee
10 กุมภา 2017 เวลา 2 นาฬิกา 53 นาที

Long Term view on SPX500 เพิ่มขึ้น

S&P 500 IndexTVC

คำอธิบาย

Obviously stock market still in bull this year.
It's on Wave 5, targetting at 2600-2900,depends on the growing speed of inflation.
For long term view, the core stategy is buy on dips.
Sell on rally should be very careful, and the stategy is only for hedging stocks in short term.
I may issue some kind of that short term strategy but it doesn't mean the reverse trending.
If you arenot holding stocks, long index is better plan.
In this post, I will only provide long signals.
For short term trade,I will open other posts.

ความคิดเห็น

Try to follow with lower time frame chart for more details of trending closely

ความคิดเห็น

revised2325.75

ความคิดเห็น

Update for wave count

ความคิดเห็น

The bullish trending since Y2009,will last till Y2023,from 666.8 to 3100(estimated) maybe.

ความคิดเห็น

Wave 3 likely going to top on arround Mar 1-Mar8
Watch the inner structure for Wave3, abc or abcde?

ความคิดเห็น

Take care of the mentioned dates in the chart

ความคิดเห็น

Weekly chart update
it's on 3 of wave 3, very bullish

ปิดการเทรด: ถึงเป้าหมายการทำกำไร

ความคิดเห็น

target reached perfectly
ความคิดเห็น
ewtrder
Thx faylee for you hard work! I just found labeling the indexes chart is rather challenging for myself since there are so many alternations developing. There is an another way of labeling the index that is still bugging me. I mean we could still in the wave 3 of primary degree that is developing now. Which means we could have an another intermediate correction before we run the final wave 5 of primary degree. Do you agree that scenario?
ewtrder
Wow we are in the extended wave 5 of primary degree which itself has an extended wave 3 and or 5! This is just like the rally of 1999!
IliyanMihaylov
???
faylee
@IliyanMihaylov,

Sorry, i made a wrong post, while i was on bed sleepy...
AdrianM
My target is also in your range at 2800 though I don't expect it to be straight up but with some pull backs
faylee
@AdrianM, agreed
เพิ่มเติม